Wednesday, May 14, 2008

More Media Outlets Equals Weaker News Stories?

Everyday I read the newspapers and listen to the radio from home online. I love being able to keep up with the current events. However, it never fails that I leave feeling more confused than enlightened. The media plays a very important role in society. It can be a watchdog over the government, a teacher for the people and a mirror that reflects the attitudes and norms of society. After weeks of reading news stories and feeling cheated, it raised the question for me: Shouldn’t more choices in news outlets mean better news stories?
There are at least four newspapers, three radio stations and granted only one television station in St. Kitts, but the choices have certainly increased. Most of us can remember when there were only two choices for newspapers and one choice for radio and television. So we have certainly stepped up but why can’t we still get reliable, quality news?
Newspapers are considered the crème among media outlets because the medium allows the writer more space and usually more time to research and present their readers with an in-depth, quality story. Television is crunched for time. A good story gets three minutes while non-breaking news will suffice with a minute and half. I know the reality of radio and television production.
So if we have all these choices now, what is the obstacle to providing accurate and credible news to our people? How can we have so many newspapers that only publish what can be considered fluff stories or rewrites of government press releases?
I think a little more pride should be taken in the words that fill the pages of the newspapers and definitely the screens of the Internet-based versions. The World Wide Web is a blessing and a curse. It connects us to the world, but it also connects the world to us. Unfortunately, if the current selections of news items that parade the websites of our media outlets are an indication, I am concerned and slightly embarrassed at the message that is being sent about my beautiful country and the intellect of my people.

4 comments:

Who_Feels_It_Knows said...

the media is bought and paid for.We see what someone else wants us to see. in addition it is all entertainment . its rare that you find something of substance on the news.

more media outlets = more clownery

Unknown said...

I also like reading about and listening to the news from home but sometimes it seems like a waste of time, I just can't get the story right! I personally like SKN vibes. By the way what's up with ZIZ homepage?

SweetPoison said...

Not many of our Journalists are trained for their profession and as such the quality of coverage that stories receive is somewhat lack luster and until that issue is addressed the same level of reporting is going to result.

Proper training on how to report and what stories should take precedence may help to improve the quality and standards of our reporting. A deviation from political affairs and political views would also help to further this.

Steve Duane "Whitty1" Whittaker said...

I echo the sentiment... 'more' has not meant 'better' and judging by the quality of writing, editing mentioning/referencing of sources (if any), there is little responsibility and pride to the craft of journalism. BUT let us not condemn too much though... we have the benefit of being a quaint enough community to criticize constructively... face to face even if we so choose.. because not everyone speaks up and few of the written/spoken 'journalists' consistently care about posts, comments or general responses... esp when the comment comes from anonymous